@danjones000 @Matt_Noyes It does not hurt to try to reduce those emissions; reducing any emissions is good.
But claiming that AI is solely responsible for climate change is intellectually dishonest.
There are plenty of other problems with AI; "burning up the planet" is not a convincing one.
@evan @danjones000 This does sound like denialism, though, doesn't it? Cow farts, and all.
Denying anthropogenic climate change? No. I worked for four years in a climate change non-profit. In this thread, I gave a few examples of human activities that cause greenhouse gas emissions.
My sole point is that it's sad when people don't understand the relative importance of different activities for causing climate change.
